Third, the methodological difficulties in capturing the social life of open research data (ORD), with some platforms providing more features to study sharing and reusing approaches than others ( Quarati and Raffaghelli, 2020). In this regard, the FAIR movement has set an agenda pushing the application of quality standard ( Association of European Research Libraries, 2017). Second, any open data quality standard parameters embedded into the digital infrastructures to share data would determine usage and sharing ( Berends et al., 2020). First, data cultures connected to disciplinary issues, research funding and value given to specific research practices address researchers' attention and practices ( Borgman, 2015 Koltay, 2017). Research on open data placed in open data repositories has considered several hypotheses in this regard.
The most enthusiastic discussions on the availability of data and the feasibility of appropriation by civil society and researchers immediately encountered other factors blocking advanced data practices, crowd science, quality in research and second-hand data usage for industry or research purposes ( Molloy, 2011).
The full terms of this licence may be seen at. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Copyright © 2021, Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli and Stefania Manca License
0 kommentar(er)
